Home News Real life Silicon Valley vs Black Mirror crossover playing out over AI ‘Friend’

Real life Silicon Valley vs Black Mirror crossover playing out over AI ‘Friend’

by Keeley Kutch

Real life Silicon Valley vs Black Mirror crossover playing out over AI ‘Friend’

Right life Silicon Valley vs Black Replicate crossover playing out over AI ‘Friend’

Right life Silicon Valley vs Black Replicate crossover playing out over AI ‘Friend’ Right life Silicon Valley vs Black Replicate crossover playing out over AI ‘Friend’

Right life Silicon Valley vs Black Replicate crossover playing out over AI ‘Friend’

Community-driven innovation meets client-focused AI in a heated contention over FRIEND technology.

Right life Silicon Valley vs Black Replicate crossover playing out over AI ‘Friend’

Hide art/illustration by ability of CryptoSlate. Image contains blended converse that will per chance well presumably encompass AI-generated converse.

Two AI initiatives named FRIEND, each led by varied developers, are at the center of a ‘Twitter Pork’ over their particular approaches to AI technology.

Nic Shevchenko and Avi Schiffmann are within the assist of the 2 particular AI initiatives, sparking debate over privateness, birth-source versus commercial pattern, and the ethical implications of AI companions. Shevchenko’s FRIEND is an birth-source AI wearable that recordsdata conversations and presents summaries and suggestion. In distinction, Schiffmann’s Pal.com presents a commercial AI accomplice featuring a conversational AI designed for emotional abet and companionship.

Shevchenko ironically congratulated Schiffmann on the launch of Pal.com with a ‘rap diss note‘ within the vein of Kendrick Lamar vs Drake, adore one thing out of the TV tell Silicon Valley. He also equipped to battle Schiffmann, posting an image of him flexing along with his FRIEND round his neck. Shevchenko claimed that Schiffmann “jacked his vogue” and he “spent a mill on a standing, can’t ship a factor” after he reportedly spent $1.8 million of the $2.5 million he raised on the domain friend.com. The FRIEND tool launched first thru its firm, Based mostly totally Hardware, whereas Schiffmann reportedly registered the friend.com domain name earlier. Schiffmann’s preliminary mission name turned into Tab, which turned into later rebranded as Pal.

Shevchenko’s FRIEND emphasizes transparency and community involvement. It is miles an birth-source customizable tool that users can blueprint and adjust. It is miles powered by the nRF52840 chip and boasts a battery life exceeding 24 hours. The mission has engaged the community thru Kickstarter and originate contests, reflecting Shevchenko’s philosophy of accessible and transparent technology pattern. FRIEND is equipped in a ‘dev kit’ for £39 on the mission’s web location, which is accessible within the perform of a 3D printed tool that interfaces with a cell app accessible on iOS and Android.

On the numerous hand, Schiffmann’s Pal.com is a shopper-oriented product priced at $ninety 9. It facets a exiguous, pendant-adore tool with a 15-hour battery life connected to a smartphone by ability of Bluetooth. The AI, driven by fashions adore ChatGPT, listens to conversations and presents personalized responses, aiming to provide companionship somewhat than appropriate productivity enhancements. The launch video reveals multiple users interacting with the tool whereas eating, staring at TV, and even on a date. One scene reveals a shopper commenting on how she takes ‘her’ in each single role in regards to the friend.com pendant. Schiffmann’s mission has garnered foremost funding and consideration, highlighted by the aquire of the domain friend.com for $1.8 million, indicating a resounding push toward big client adoption.

A chief PR push on July 31 for friend.com has seen protection in multiple recordsdata retail outlets for the accomplice tool, with many commenting on its launch video’s similarity to a Black Replicate episode. In distinction, Shevchenko’s tool acts extra adore a ‘second mind,’ paying attention to conversations and offering summaries which may per chance perhaps well well be searchable and accessible thru the supporting in-app chatbot. It enables users to take notes in conferences without breaking focal level or quick recall the names of most modern acquaintances without embarrassment.

The broader X (formerly Twitter) discourse surrounding these initiatives finds divergent views. Privacy is a central misfortune, with users questioning the implications of devices that always be all ears to conversations. Specific scrutiny is given to how these initiatives arrange client recordsdata, especially given the non-public nature of the interactions they facilitate. Some argue that whereas Shevchenko’s birth-source manner presents extra transparency, it does not fully mitigate privateness concerns. Alternatively, the dev kits enable users to replace API endpoints in-app to their very trust endpoints. Others explicit skepticism about Schiffmann’s commercial mannequin, fearing a doubtless over-reliance on AI companions that will per chance well presumably alter human relationships.

The debate extends to the persona of human interaction, with concerns about AI’s affect on social dynamics. Critics misfortune in regards to the effects of the use of AI for companionship, suggesting it can per chance well presumably consequence in a diminished need for human connection. Conversely, some supporters payment AI’s ability to provide emotional abet, in particular for folk lacking social interaction.

Shevchenko’s initiative stands out for its birth-source ethos, spirited community engagement and fostering innovation thru transparency. Schiffmann’s mission, nonetheless, represents a extra customary commercial manner, aiming for a advanced client ride and broader market attain. The contrasting strategies highlight a classic divide within the tech community: the balance between openness and proprietary adjust and the ethical concerns of increasing AI companions.

Posted In: AI, Tradition, Featured

Source credit : cryptoslate.com

Related Posts