OpenAI counters Musk’s lawsuit by highlighting his past profit advocacy
Home News OpenAI counters Musk’s lawsuit by highlighting his past profit advocacy

OpenAI counters Musk’s lawsuit by highlighting his past profit advocacy

by Jaron Sanford

OpenAI counters Musk’s lawsuit by highlighting his past profit advocacy

OpenAI counters Musk's lawsuit by highlighting his previous income advocacy

OpenAI counters Musk’s lawsuit by highlighting his previous income advocacy OpenAI counters Musk’s lawsuit by highlighting his previous income advocacy

OpenAI counters Musk’s lawsuit by highlighting his previous income advocacy

OpenAI defends its for-income shift, highlighting Musk's preliminary pork up and later requires for adjust.

OpenAI counters Musk’s lawsuit by highlighting his previous income advocacy

Mask art/illustration through CryptoSlate. Image entails mixed allege material that can also embody AI-generated allege material.

Be half of Japan's Web3 Evolution Nowadays

OpenAI has countered Elon Musk’s fresh lawsuit, emphasizing that the billionaire had previously advocated for the corporate’s shift to a for-income construction.

Musk, in point of fact one of OpenAI’s co-founders, has accused the AI company of leaving at the lend a hand of its nonprofit roots, submitting a original lawsuit in August after withdrawing an earlier complaint.

Early discussions and governance disputes

In a Dec. 13 blog put up and courtroom filings, OpenAI highlighted Musk’s early involvement in shaping its construction and famous that he had raised concerns about working as a nonprofit sooner than the group’s 2015 beginning.

Musk had instructed in an email at the time that a “commonplace C corp with a parallel nonprofit” shall be more effective. OpenAI argued that this demonstrates Musk’s preliminary pork up for flexibility in its organizational arrangement.

Paperwork declare Musk revisited the concern in 2017, proposing a transition to a for-income mannequin following necessary technological advancements at OpenAI.

In a single alternate, co-founder Greg Brockman famous that Musk viewed a nonprofit as potentially contaminated for OpenAI’s ambitions, a sentiment Brockman and other leaders reportedly shared.

Then but again, tensions arose when Musk sought adjust over the proposed for-income entity. OpenAI acknowledged that Musk had instructed his monetary group to receive a public income company beneath his management, inquiring for majority ownership, board dominance, and the feature of CEO.

These phrases were rejected by OpenAI’s management, including CEO Sam Altman, leading to Musk’s departure from the board in 2018.

For-income transition and funding concerns

In 2019, OpenAI presented a capped-income construction governed by its nonprofit arm.

Based mostly completely totally on the group, the resolution became pushed by the must receive immense funding to compete in the shortly evolving AI panorama. Significant investments, including necessary backing from Microsoft, followed the exchange.

OpenAI’s good group additionally disclosed that Musk became equipped equity in the capped-income entity on a pair of cases nonetheless declined. They famous Musk’s prior assertion in 2019 asking OpenAI to explicitly verify that he had no monetary interest in its for-income operations.

Musk, who launched xAI in 2023, has positioned his company as a competitor to OpenAI. xAI has reportedly raised billions in funding and presented unique units to reveal OpenAI’s generative AI instruments admire ChatGPT.

Musk’s August lawsuit argues that OpenAI’s transition betrayed its founding ideas, nonetheless the group maintains that Musk’s claims fail to see his early feature in advocating for structural adjustments.

The escalating good battle displays a deeper fight over the manner forward for AI construction, with OpenAI and xAI vying for dominance in an an increasing number of competitive field.

Mentioned listed here
Posted In: US, AI, Featured, Moral
People were interested in these podcasts
Play Episode
30min
CryptoSlate SlateCast
Mapping the future: Brent van der Heiden on MapMetrics, drive-to-earn, and the power of DePIN
In the latest episode of the SlateCast, CryptoSlate Editor-in-Chief Liam “Akiba” Wright sat down with Brent van der Heiden, the founder and CEO of MapMetrics. The conversation delved deep into how MapMetrics is revolutionizing navigation, data privacy, and user incentives through the emerging DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks) sector.From Navigation to Data MonetizationMapMetrics introduces a “drive-to-earn” model, offering users a way to earn crypto rewards by contributing traffic and navigation data. Unlike traditional GPS services that monetize users’ data without compensation, MapMetrics puts the power — and the profit — back into users’ hands.“What we came to realize is that almost all the DePINs need a map to showcase where the data is located,” Brent explained. “So we’re building kind of like the renewed Google Maps — but for DePIN.”By enabling users to contribute data anonymously, MapMetrics positions itself as a privacy-first alternative to big tech services. “You don’t have to fill in your real name or your email address. You can just fake something and then we don’t have your data,” said Brent.Creating Value Through CrowdsourcingA cornerstone of MapMetrics’ platform is incentivized crowdsourcing. Users contribute not only live traffic data but also rich metadata like menu photos, street updates, or local business details. This data feeds into an evolving map powered by both users and AI tools.“We’re going to send people on quests and use our AI tools to fill the data gaps,” Brent explained. “For example, if you take a picture of a restaurant menu, we’ll extract dishes, ingredients, and prices. Then users can search not just by cuisine, but by the specific dish they want.”This innovative fusion of human input and machine intelligence is driving a smarter, more personalized navigation experience. It’s a shift from basic search results to AI-powered decision-making.The B2B Revenue Engine Behind the VisionTo sustain its tokenomics and rewa
CryptoSlate SlateCast
From failure to fortune: Jonathan Bouzanquet on blockchain and gaming
Jonathan Bouzanquet, the Co-Founder and Chief Strategy Officer of Playa3ull Games, joined CryptoSlate’s SlateCast alongside Editor-in-Chief Liam “Akiba” Wright and CEO Nate Whitehill. In a thought-provoking discussion, Bouzanquet shared his vision for blockchain gaming, emphasizing a community-first approach, sustainable funding, and the potential of blockchain technology to revolutionize the gaming industry.Building Games Backwards: A Player-Centric PhilosophyThe discussion delved into Playa3ull's unique approach to game development, which they call "building games backwards." This method emphasizes community involvement from the outset.Jonathan stated, "With Play3bull, we bring the community back into the game. We don't want to just tell the player, this is our game, play it or fuck off. We want to say, here's the game. What do you think? How can we make it better?"This strategy involves an advisory council rather than a traditional DAO, aiming for a dialogue between developers and players to shape the game's evolution based on real feedback.The Importance of Digital Asset OwnershipA significant part of the conversation revolved around the benefits of blockchain for gaming, particularly in terms of asset ownership. Jonathan highlighted the frustrations with traditional gaming where players do not own their in-game achievements."Since you invest such enormous amounts of time, it's important to have those assets owned and they are valuable,"he remarked, envisioning a future where these assets could have inter-game utility.Playa3ull's Economic Model: The Bull TokenJonathan detailed Playa3ull's economic system, centered around the Bull Token. Unlike many gaming platforms with separate tokens for each game, Playa3ull uses a single token across its ecosystem for stability and broader utility."So, our coin comes into existence through our node system... half the coin goes to the company for company function, and half the coin goes to the nodes,"he explained, outlining a
CryptoSlate SlateCast
Decentralizing AI infrastructure with Gaurav Sharma, CTO of io.net
In a recent SlateCast episode, Gaurav Sharma, CTO of io.net, joined CryptoSlate’s Editor-in-Chief Liam “Akiba” Wright and CEO Nate Whitehill to discuss io.net’s groundbreaking approach to decentralized infrastructure for AI. With a background at tech giants like Binance and Amazon, Sharma brings deep expertise in scaling technology to a decentralized platform. io.net is paving the way for a decentralized ecosystem that aims to democratize access to AI resources, reduce costs, and enable greater innovation.The Vision Behind io.netSharma explained io.net’s role as a Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network (DePIN) that leverages community-powered hardware.“Our inventory comes from the community,” Sharma noted. “We don’t own our hardware; we aggregate it from individuals, data centers, and companies.”This model drastically reduces user costs compared to centralized giants like Amazon Web Services (AWS).He highlighted the efficiency of this model:“For instance, an H100 GPU on a centralized platform might cost eight times more than what we offer. Our decentralized model empowers startups by cutting costs and enabling them to allocate resources toward innovation.”Challenges in Decentralized AI InfrastructureBuilding a decentralized AI system presents unique challenges. Sharma emphasized the need for robust distributed systems, scalability, and transparency.“Decentralized infrastructure cannot rely on monolithic tech stacks,” he explained. “The team must excel at distributed systems and computational fundamentals.”Moreover, latency sensitivity and scalability were critical from day one, as io.net’s users often come from high-demand enterprises. Sharma also stressed the importance of trust and transparency in the crypto ecosystem.“Our block explorer showcases every aspect of our network, from GPU availability to revenue metrics. Transparency is the foundation of trust,” he said.Empowering Developers Through TokenomicsOne of io.net’s core innovations is incentivizing co
CryptoSlate SlateCast
Paul Kohlhaas explores crypto’s role in revolutionizing Biotech
In a recent episode of the SlateCast, Paul Kohlhaas, the founder of BIO Protocol, joined CryptoSlate CEO Nate Whitehill and Senior Editor Liam "Akiba" Wright to discuss the future of biotechnology through decentralized science (DeSci). Kohlhaas explained BIO Protocol's vision for revolutionizing biotech funding and research by utilizing decentralized, open-source methods.Biotechnology as the Substrate for LifeBIO XYZ represents more than a typical biotech initiative. As Kohlhaas explained,“BIO XYZ stands for a movement to not be afraid of biotechnology, to like embrace it, and that it should be much more open source, back in the hands of the people.”The concept draws from "bio-accelerationism," echoing the AI acceleration movement in the tech world. Biotechnology, Kohlhaas argues, should be considered a new "substrate for life," akin to how artificial intelligence became a new substrate for intelligence.Kohlhaas elaborated on the fear surrounding biotechnology and genetic engineering, drawing parallels with the early fears surrounding AI.“People are afraid of genetic engineering and new biotechnological advances. However, just as AI has seen a movement to decentralize it, we believe biotechnology should be back in the hands of the people.”Empowering Patients and Scientists with DAOsBIO Protocol’s core innovation is decentralizing biotech research by connecting scientists, patients, and investors through decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs). These DAOs allow communities to directly fund research that addresses specific medical challenges. Kohlhaas highlighted VitaDAO as a successful example, stating,“VitaDAO funded research into autophagy activators—substances that help healthy cells eliminate old cells—leading to novel drug developments.”In this decentralized model, patients can have a more significant role, providing not only funds but also valuable insights. “Patients often know what’s best for them,” Kohlhaas remarked, emphasizing the importance of invol

Source credit : cryptoslate.com

Related Posts