Ethereum layer-2 ZKsync faces scrutiny from Solana co-founder
Ethereum layer-2 ZKsync faces scrutiny from Solana co-founder
Yakovenko acknowledged ZKSync's governance peaceable strategies love a multisig.
Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko has criticized the Ethereum layer-2 network ZKsync because it peaceable operates love a multisig contrivance despite claims of neighborhood-led governance.
In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Yakovenko argued that the same “real majority” assumptions observe to ZKsync because its contrivance’s real or technical control may perhaps well well with out exclaim drop beneath the jurisdiction of a court, compromising its decentralization.
Based totally on him:
“Ample of the token holders to form a quorum and enough of the ‘professional security council’ is liable to be interior peep of a rando US economic extinguish determine that may perhaps well well issue all of them take your total bridged resources beneath control of a economic extinguish belief.”
His feedback had been in accordance with Alex Gluchowski, co-founder and CEO of Subject Labs, the group of workers on the help of ZKsync. Gluchowski had claimed the network’s unique decentralized governance contrivance used to be not a multisig setup and making “a serious step in direction of Stage 2.”
Stage 2 refers to a transition from keen on elephantine decentralization. In this stage, belief is placed entirely in the blockchain’s code and algorithms, guaranteeing the contrivance is birth, salvage, and resistant to manipulation.
Critically, no Ethereum layer-2 network is entirely in Stage 2 of its decentralization vogue.
Decentralized governance
On Sept. 12, Gluchowski announced that ZKsync’s governance contrivance had long past dwell.
The contrivance introduces a three-physiology, which contains the ZK token assemblyâa neighborhood of token holders who delegate their balloting energy to delegates. These delegates can publish and vote on protocol, token, and governance toughen proposals.
Based totally on the group of workers:
“This is presumably the perfect capacity aspect of the contrivance: token holders and their Delegates can birth traditional upgrades to the ZKsync protocol at the moment onchain, as a alternative of relying on a single multisig.”
Meanwhile, Delegates will moreover maintain real security through the ZKsync Association, an ownerless non-revenue that addresses interior most licensed responsibility issues.
The 2d allotment of the governance structure is the ZKsync Safety Council, which includes engineers, auditors, and security professionals. The Council has the energy to appear at and actively approve protocol upgrades, freeze the protocol, and publish needed time-aloof upgrades.
Then another time, their energy is constrained as they are going to not publish and approve upgrades unilaterally.
Lastly, the ZKsync Guardians guarantee governance proposals align with the foundations of the ZK Credo. They retain veto energy and motivate as a check on the diversified governance bodies.
The three governance entitiesâthe Token Assembly, Safety Council, and Guardiansâcollaborate to appear at and discontinue proposals, akin to ZKsync Enhancements, Token Programs, and Governance Advisory modifications. The Token Assembly can publish proposals, which the Guardians can veto if wanted, and the Safety Council must approve protocol upgrades.
In actuality, this structure prevents americans or groups from having unilateral control over proposals and upgrades.
Mentioned on this article
Source credit : cryptoslate.com