Elon Musk leads $97 billion bid to buy non-profit arm of OpenAI amid Sam Altman rejection
![Elon Musk leads $97 billion bid to buy non-profit arm of OpenAI amid Sam Altman rejection 406 Elon Musk leads $97 billion expose to purchase non-profit arm of OpenAI amid Sam Altman rejection](https://cryptoslate.com/wp-content/themes/cryptoslate-2020/imgresize/timthumb.php?src=https://cryptoslate.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/elonmusk-openai.jpg&w=70&h=37&q=75)
Elon Musk leads $97 billion expose to purchase non-profit arm of OpenAI amid Sam Altman rejection
Sam Altman dismisses Elon Musk's OpenAI takeover expose, proposing as a change to purchase Twitter for $9.74 billion.
![Elon Musk leads $97 billion bid to buy non-profit arm of OpenAI amid Sam Altman rejection 410 Elon Musk leads $97 billion expose to purchase non-profit arm of OpenAI amid Sam Altman rejection](https://cryptoslate.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/elonmusk-openai-768x403.jpg)
ZACK/MCOM / CC BY 2.0 DEED / Wikimedia. Remixed by CryptoSlate
A consortium led by Elon Musk has submitted a $97.4 billion expose to secure the non-profit that controls OpenAI. The expose aims to reverse the group’s shift from its usual non-profit mission to a structure designed to stable capital for AI overview, a trade that has drawn Musk’s criticism.
Sam Altman, OpenAI’s CEO, brushed apart the proposal on X by tweeting, “No thank you, but we are in a position to purchase Twitter for $9.74 billion while you happen to desire,” on Feb. 11, highlighting the diversifications in vision between him and Musk.
Consistent with Reuters, the consortium involves Musk’s AI startup, xAI, and funding groups equivalent to Baron Capital and Emanuel Capital. Musk, who co-essentially based OpenAI in 2015 sooner than leaving amid disagreements over its direction, has argued that the group may maybe maybe maybe furthermore merely composed return to its founding dedication to commence overview and public serve. Real disputes enjoy adopted these issues; Musk filed swimsuit closing yr, alleging that contemporary management had prioritized profit over the non-profit’s usual needs. The expose may maybe maybe maybe furthermore consequence in a merger between the for-profit xAI and OpenAI’s governing body, altering the group’s structure and procedure.
OpenAI has pursued funding to reinforce its AI building. In its newest funding round, the group used to be valued at $157 billion, with discussions underway to lift funds to magnify its valuation to $300 billion. The deliberate transition to a for-profit structure is supposed to stable the capital required to compete within the AI market. Analysts counsel that Musk’s expose may maybe maybe maybe furthermore complicate these fundraising efforts by forcing the board to weigh monetary advantages against the threat of diluting the group’s core motive.
Musk’s monetary procedure within the expose reportedly involves leveraging his stake in Tesla, valued at $165 billion. This stake may maybe maybe maybe furthermore very successfully be collateral for financing the provide, whilst contemporary monetary moves following his acquisition of X enjoy reportedly restricted accessible liquidity. Business observers present that the consortium’s backing, which involves a lot of funding firms, may maybe maybe maybe furthermore merely provide monetary strength to the proposal.
No matter Altman’s public rejection, OpenAI’s board will likely composed analysis the provide. The board’s deliberations will contend with challenges posed by the intriguing competitive panorama in AI, the likelihood of a merger with xAI, and the implications of accepting a expose from a figure who has continuously adversarial the group’s contemporary trajectory.
Currently leading the Division of Government Efficiency, Musk’s story of corporate takeovers is marked by contentious boardroom battles and proper maneuvers. Even supposing he is time and again perceived as a founding father of Tesla, his role started as a key investor sooner than he leveraged his impact to displace the firm’s usual management.
His acquisition of Twitter and confrontations with OpenAI’s management illustrate a consistent procedure of the utilization of monetary leverage and litigation to claim retain watch over. These actions enjoy sparked debate over governance practices and the concentration of energy in predominant tech ventures.
His contemporary expose for OpenAI now echoes this pattern, underlining a legacy marked by aggressive, usually controversial, acquisition ways. It is far unclear how the non-profit aspect of OpenAI would work in tandem with his for-profit xAI, a key competitor of OpenAI as a industrial entity.
Mentioned on this article
Source credit : cryptoslate.com