ECB will ‘assess’ ties with national banks holding Bitcoin reserves
![ECB will ‘assess’ ties with national banks holding Bitcoin reserves 418 ECB will ‘assess’ ties with nationwide banks retaining Bitcoin reserves](https://cryptoslate.com/wp-content/themes/cryptoslate-2020/imgresize/timthumb.php?src=https://cryptoslate.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ecb-bitcoin.jpg&w=70&h=37&q=75)
ECB will ‘assess’ ties with nationwide banks retaining Bitcoin reserves
ECB stays skeptical of Bitcoin's role as a reserve asset despite CNB's curiosity in doable inclusion.
![ECB will ‘assess’ ties with national banks holding Bitcoin reserves 422 ECB will ‘assess’ ties with nationwide banks retaining Bitcoin reserves](https://cryptoslate.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ecb-bitcoin-768x403.jpg)
Duvet art/illustration by CryptoSlate. Describe entails mixed express which would perhaps well simply embody AI-generated express.
The European Central Financial institution (ECB) would perhaps well simply rethink its relationship with any European nationwide monetary institution that provides Bitcoin to its reserves, in step with ECB board member Piero Cipollone.
In a Feb. 6 interview, Cipollone instructed that if a nationwide monetary institution integrates Bitcoin into its holdings, the institution would must assess the risks associated with its repurchase agreements (repo) and swap traces.
He indispensable that the ECB would resolve whether to retain ties with such banks after conducting this review. In step with him:
“We would must get a probability administration evaluation of that. Letâs see if any central monetary institution enters this space because I donât fully see the explanation for it. We can assess it at that level in time, if it happens.”
Cipollone reiterated his skepticism about Bitcoin’s role as a reserve asset. He emphasised that BTC lacks intrinsic cost and instructed that its main allure comes from hypothesis on tag appreciation.
In step with him, investing in BTC relies on the realization that its tag will constantly upward push, as the asset has no underlying cost, backing, or incomes model.
He acknowledged:
“I'm seeking to be rational and verify why I need to make investments in bitcoin or some other crypto-asset. Basically the most attention-grabbing rationale is if one thinks that the tag will gradually toddle up. It doesnât possess any underlying cost, there may be no asset backing it, there may be no incomes model.”
Cipollone’s comment follows fresh trends within the Czech Nationwide Financial institution (CNB), which is evaluating the functionality inclusion of Bitcoin in its reserve resources. On the other hand, ECB President Christine Lagarde has expressed self belief that the CNB and varied most indispensable European central banks are unlikely to approve BTC as a reserve asset.
Bitcoin vs Gold
Cipollone also brushed off comparisons between Bitcoin and gold, arguing that the 2 resources vary in market construction, transparency, and adoption.
Whereas BTC shares some characteristics with gold, corresponding to scarcity and a perceived store of cost, he believes the comparison is flawed.
He acknowledged:
“I would perhaps well presumably be cautious about making the analogy. I donât know how deep the market for gold is, but there are central banks in that market, and no longer gentle thanks to a legacy system. We need to no longer cease at a superficial analogy between gold and bitcoin.”
Cipollone additional pointed out that gold benefits from historical significance and established industrial and industrial use, in incompatibility to BTC, which would not share these attributes.
He remarked:
“[Central banks invest in gold] in half attributable to legacy, but gold has intrinsic, industrial and industrial cost. Bitcoin would not possess any of that.”
He also argued that Bitcoin and gold are impractical for everyday transactions when compared with fiat currencies, which facilitate funds and provide relative stability.
Source credit : cryptoslate.com