Home News SBF lawyers slam ‘death-in-prison’ sentence proposal citing lack of losses

SBF lawyers slam ‘death-in-prison’ sentence proposal citing lack of losses

by Thaddeus Lemke

SBF lawyers slam ‘death-in-prison’ sentence proposal citing lack of losses

SBF legal professionals slam 'death-in-jail' sentence proposal citing lack of losses

SBF legal professionals slam ‘death-in-jail’ sentence proposal citing lack of losses SBF legal professionals slam ‘death-in-jail’ sentence proposal citing lack of losses

SBF legal professionals slam ‘death-in-jail’ sentence proposal citing lack of losses

SBF protection argued that no tangible losses happened. So, they are attempting to safe a reduced 78 month sentence as one more.

SBF legal professionals slam ‘death-in-jail’ sentence proposal citing lack of losses

Duvet paintings/illustration through CryptoSlate. Image includes mixed assert which would perchance simply embrace AI-generated assert.

Sam Bankman-Fried’s (SBF) legal professionals have heavily criticized the Division of Justice’s sentencing memorandum in a March 19 letter to Make a resolution Lewis Kaplan.

In the letter, the legal professionals described the DOJ’s proposed maximum sentence of fifty years imprisonment for SBF as “anxious” and “with marked hostility.”

Based on the legal professionals:

“The memorandum distorts truth to improve its valuable “loss” epic and casts Sam as a sinful enormous-villain; it attributes to him darkish and megalomaniacal motives that waft within the face of the epic; it makes apocalyptic prophecies of recidivism; and it adopts a medieval scrutinize of punishment to realize what amounts to a death-in-jail sentencing recommendation.”

They additional argued that the authorities’s memorandum entirely ignores SBF’s situation and vulnerabilities, alongside side that the proposed sentencing modified into the authorities’s strive to “atomize Sam Bankman-Fried” as there has been no “federal defendant convicted of a non-violent offense who served a 40-50 year sentence and modified into launched.”

Diminished sentencing

SBF’s exact team presented a series of arguments to indicate for a reduced sentence for him.

First and main, they contended that there had been no tangible losses for the reason that economic atomize complaints would perchance be sure full restitution to all customers and lenders.

The legal professionals wrote:

“There were never losses. The money has repeatedly been available. Resources remain. Every victim quoted within the authorities’s opposition will receive 100 cents on the buck — plus pastime. This could per chance be very now not actually if the estate’s sources had disappeared into Sam’s personal pockets.”

Furthermore, they rebutted the prosecution’s portrayal of Bankman-Fried as being motivated by greed. They highlighted his philanthropic endeavors, stating that SBF had given his earnings away before constructing the failed crypto entities FTX and Alameda Evaluate.

Furthermore, they challenged the authorities’s assertion that Bankman-Fried posed a valuable menace of re-offending, citing be taught indicating low rates of recidivism amongst white-collar, educated individuals with unbiased correct-looking out prior records.

“Offenders with out a prison historical past, esteem Sam, are the least inclined to re-offend. Nor does offense level predict recidivism. And offenders with a college training are less inclined to recidivate,” they concluded.

As such, they proposed a reduced sentence of a maximum of 78 months, much like 6.5 years, for their client.

Talked about on this text
Posted In: FTX, Featured, Appropriate

Source credit : cryptoslate.com

Related Posts